Dissociative Experiences Scale: Psychometric Analysis in Puerto Rico and Contributions to the Discussion of the Factor Structure
Abstract
Introduction: The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) is a widely used psychometric tool to assess dissociative symptoms. Over the years, it has been the subject of numerous studies and research in various fields of psychology and psychiatry. Numerous studies have supported the validity and reliability of the DES-II as a reliable measure of dissociative experiences. The most problematic aspect of the DES-II is the inconsistency in its factor structure. Objective: This research aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the DES-II in a clinical and non-clinical sample from Puerto Rico. Method: This research had an instrumental design. An availability sampling of 341 adult participants was used. Several competing models of the DES-II were analyzed, including a bifactor model. Result: Psychometric analyses concluded that the scale has a unidimensional structure, strong reliability, and construct validity. All 28 items met adequate discrimination values. Participants with dissociative disorders obtained higher means on the DES-II than the other diagnostic groups. Furthermore, the more adverse experiences in childhood, the more dissociative experiences in adulthood. Conclusion: The DES-II should be treated and interpreted as a unidimensional dissociation index rather than a multidimensional instrument. This study will advance further research on dissociation and dissociative disorders in Puerto Rico and Latin America.
Downloads
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Arifin, W. N. (2023). Sample size calculator (web). Retrieved from http://wnarifin.github.io
Armour, C., Contractor, A. A., Palmieri, P. A., & Elhai, J. D. (2014). Assessing latent level associations between PTSD and dissociative factors: Is depersonalization and derealization related to PTSD factors more so than alternative dissociative factors? Psychological Injury and Law, 7(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9196-9
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Berge, J. M. F. T., & Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289858
Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
Cardeña, E., & Carlson, E. (2011). Acute stress disorder revisited. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104502
Carlson, E. B., & Putnam, F. W. (1993). An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 6(1), 16–27.
Chiu, C. D., Meg Tseng, M. C., Chien, Y. L., Liao, S. C., Liu, C. M., Yeh, Y. Y., Hwu, H. G., & Ross, C. A. (2017). Dissociative disorders in acute psychiatric inpatients in Taiwan. Psychiatry Research, 250, 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.082
Dell, P. F. (2006). The multidimensional inventory of dissociation (MID): A comprehensive measure of pathological dissociation. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 7(2), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J229v07n02_06
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th Ed). Sage Publications.
Dominguez-Lara, S., & Rodriguez, A. (2017). Statistical indices from bifactor models. Interacciones, 3(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017.v3n2.51
Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(1), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x
Espírito Santo, H., & Abreu, J. L. (2009). Portuguese validation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 10(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299730802485177
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Fung, H. W., Ross, C. A., Yu, C. K., & Lau, E. K. (2019). Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Hong Kong mental health service users. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 20(4), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2019.1597808
Garofalo, C., Velotti, P., Zavattini, G. C., Tommasi, M., Romanelli, R., Espírito Santo, H., & Saggino, A. (2015). On the factor structure of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: ontribution with an Italian version of the DES-II. Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna, 15(1), 4–12.
Gignac, G. E. (2016). The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: That is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence, 55, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.006
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking Construct Reliability within Latent Variable Systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. S? Sörbom (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future (pp. 195-216). Scientific Software International.
Hankins, M. (2008). How discriminating are discriminative instruments? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(1), 36. http://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-36
Icarán, E., Colom, R., & Orengo García, F. (1996). Experiencias disociativas: Una escala de medida. Anuario de Psicología, 70(3), 69–84.
Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage.
Körlin, D., Edman, G., & Nybäck, H. (2007). Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II). Nordic journal of psychiatry, 61(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480701226112
Larøi, F., Billieux, J., Defeldre, A.-C., Ceschi, G., & Van der Linden, M. (2013). Factorial structure and psychometric properties of the French adaptation of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) in non-clinical participants. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2013.04.004
Lipsanen, T., Saarijärvi, S., & Lauerma, H. (2003). The Finnish version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) and psychiatric distress. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480310000211
Lyssenko, L., Schmahl, C., Bockhacker, L., Vonderlin, R., Bohus, M., & Kleindienst, N. (2018). Dissociation in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using the Dissociative Experiences Scale. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010025
Martínez-Taboas, A. (1995). The use of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in Puerto Rico. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 8(1), 14–23.
Mazzotti, E., Farina, B., Imperatori, C., Mansutti, F., Prunetti, E., Speranza, A. M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2016). Is the Dissociative Experiences Scale able to identify detachment and compartmentalization symptoms? Factor structure of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a large sample of psychiatric and nonpsychiatric subjects. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S105110
Moral de la Rubia, J. (2019). Revisión de los criterios para validez convergente estimada a través de la Varianza Media Extraída. Psychologia: Avances de la Disciplina, 13(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.4119
Nijenhuis, E. R., Spinhoven, P., Van Dyck, R., Van der Hart, O., & Vanderlinden, J. (1996). The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20). The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184(11), 688–694. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199611000-00006
Putnam, F. W. (2000). Dissociative disorders. In A. J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 739–754). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4163-9_39
Putnam, F. W., Carlson, E. B., Ross, C. A., Anderson, G., Clark, P., Torem, M., Bowman, E. S., Coons, P., Chu, J. A., Dill, D. L., Loewenstein, R. J., & Braun, B. G. (1996). Patterns of dissociation in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184(11), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199611000-00004
Ray, W. J., & Faith, M. (1995). Dissociative experiences in a college age population: Follow-up with 1190 subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)00137-H
Ray, W. J., June, K., Turaj, K., & Lundy, R. (1992). Dissociative experiences in a college age population: A factor analytic study of two dissociation scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90069-2
Reise, S. P. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
Robles-García, R., Garibay-Rico, S. E., & Páez-Agráz, F. (2006). Evaluación de trastornos disociativos en población psiquiátrica mexicana: Prevalencia, comorbilidad y características psicométricas de la Escala de Experiencias Disociativas. Salud Mental, 29(2), 38–43.
Ross, C. A., Heber, S., Norton, G. R., Anderson, D., Anderson, G., & Barchet, P. (1989). The Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule: A structured interview. Dissociation: Progress in the Dissociative Disorders, 2(3), 169–189.
Ruiz, M. A., Poythress, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Douglas, K. S. (2008). Factor structure and correlates of the dissociative experiences scale in a large offender sample. Assessment, 15(4), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108315548
Saggino, A., Molinengo, G., Rogier, G., Garofalo, C., Loera, B., Tommasi, M., & Velotti, P. (2020). Improving the psychometric properties of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II): A Rasch validation study. BMC Psychiatry, 20, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2417-8
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Somer, E., Dolgin, M., & Saadon, M. (2001). Validation of the Hebrew version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (H-DES) in Israel. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2(2), 53-65.
Spitzer, C., Freyberger, H. J., Stieglitz, R. D., Carlson, E. B., Kuhn, G., Magdeburg, N., & Kessler, C. (1998). Adaptation and psychometric properties of the German version of the Dissociative Experience Scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(4), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024457819547
Steinberg M. (2000). Advances in the clinical assessment of dissociation: the SCID-D-R. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 64(2), 146–163.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106
Vanderlinden, J., Van Dyck, R., Vandereycken, W., Vertommen, H., & Jan Verkes, R. (1993). The dissociation questionnaire (DIS-Q): Development and characteristics of a new self-report questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1(1), 21–27.
Zinbarg, R. E., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621605278814
Copyright (c) 2023 Interacciones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and that they can edit it, reproduce it, distribute it, exhibit it and communicate it in the country and abroad through printed and digital media.
The digital version of the journal is registered under a Creative Commons license (Under Creative Commons License): Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the names of the authors and Interacciones.
Therefore, it is established that authors can make other independent and additional behavioural agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in institutional repositories or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
