Some considerations prior to estimating the reliability of psychometric instruments
Abstract
[Letter to the Editor]
Downloads
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Armor, D. J. (1973). Theta reliability and factor scaling. Sociological methodology, 5, 17-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/270831
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Deng, L., & Chan, W. (2017). Testing the difference between reliability coefficients alpha and omega. Educational and psychological measurement, 77(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164416658325
Domínguez-Lara, S. A. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychologia. Avances de la disciplina, 10(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.2134
Dominguez-Lara, S. A., & Merino-Soto, C. (2017). Una modificación del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach por errores correlacionados. Revista médica de Chile, 145(2), 270-271.
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British journal of psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Elosua, P. & Zumbo, B. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2515245920951747
Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17(1), 3.
Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288892
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis, Seventh Edition. Pearson Education Limited Harlow.
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. En R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Soerbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195-216). Scientific Software International.
Hoyt, C. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 6(3), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289270
Jackson, P. H., & Agunwamba, C. C. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: I: Algebraic lower bounds. Psychometrika, 42(4), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295979
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological methods, 23(3), 412. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
Muñiz, J. (2010). Las teorías de los tests: teoría clásica y teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 57-66.
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2019). Thanks coefficient alpha, we still need you!. Educational and psychological measurement, 79(1), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164417725127
Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
Savalei, V., Reise, S. P., Vazire, S., & Fried, E. (2019). Don’t Forget the Model in Your Model-based Reliability Coefficients: A Reply to McNeish (2018). Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.247
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107.
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755-782.
Copyright (c) 2021 Interacciones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and that they can edit it, reproduce it, distribute it, exhibit it and communicate it in the country and abroad through printed and digital media.
The digital version of the journal is registered under a Creative Commons license (Under Creative Commons License): Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the names of the authors and Interacciones.
Therefore, it is established that authors can make other independent and additional behavioural agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in institutional repositories or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
