The measurement equivalence bias in multigroup analyzes. Factorial invariance for comparisons in social and health sciences
Abstract
Letter to the editor.
Downloads
References
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495-508.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (Vol. 2nd). New York: Guilford Publications.
Byrne, B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.Psicothema, 20(4), 872-882.
Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. (2010). Testing for measurement and structuralequivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of none-quivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10(2), 107–132.
Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality.Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 14.
Caycho, T. (2017). Importancia del análisis de invarianza factorial en estudios comparativos en Ciencias de la Salud.Educación Médica Superior, 31(2), 1-3.
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review Sociology, 40,(2)55–75.doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137.
Dominguez-Lara, S., & Medrano, L. (2016). Invarianza factorial del Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnarie (CERQ) en universitarios limeños y cordobeses. Universitas Psychologica, 15(1), 89-98.Doi: 10.11144/ Javeriana.upsy15-1.ifce.
Elosua, P. (2003). Sobre la validez de los tests. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 315-321.
Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.Behavior research methods, 48(3), 936-949.DOI: 10.3758/s1342
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford press.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance.Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543.
Moreta-Herrera, R., López-Calle, C., Ramos-Ramírez, M., & López-Castro, J. (2018). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del Cuestionario de Salud General de Goldberg (GHQ-12) en universitarios ecuatorianos.Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 10(3), 35-42.
Piovani, J. I., & Krawczyk, N. (2017). Los Estudios Comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas.Educação & Realidade, 42(3), 821-840.
Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., Lek, K., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2015). Measurement invariance.Frontiers in psychology, 6(1064).Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01064.
Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time.Child Development Perspectives,4,10-18. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x.
Copyright (c) 2020 Interacciones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and that they can edit it, reproduce it, distribute it, exhibit it and communicate it in the country and abroad through printed and digital media.
The digital version of the journal is registered under a Creative Commons license (Under Creative Commons License): Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the names of the authors and Interacciones.
Therefore, it is established that authors can make other independent and additional behavioural agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in institutional repositories or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
